SA politics - comment on our new minister of environmental affairs and tourism

10 years of democracy
South Africa's 2004 General Election

Our 2004 General Elections have come and gone. The ANC has won again with a huge majority and can rightfully claim to have been given a solid mandate for "more of the same".

While no one was really surprised by the final outcome, what did take many by surprise was the selection of leader of the NNP Marthinus van Schalkwyk as our Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. His appointment elicited numerous letters to the press, including one from EMG....

"Dear Editor

If, instead of announcing his Cabinet on Wednesday, President Mbheki had announced that the responsibilities of the environmental ministry were the least important of all issues facing our country, I would have thought he was joking. After all, it is the poorest who bear the brunt of environmental degradation. They suffer the most from industrial and agricultural pollution. The effects of climate change, floods and droughts on food production and food prices first hurt the poor. Declining fish stocks and inappropriate policies turn artisanal fishers into poachers and poorly paid workers at fish factories. Indigenous knowledge held by rural communities about the medicinal use of plant species is increasingly exploited by drug companies with little or no compensation. I could go on.

So why is it that the environmental portfolio is always given such low status?

With all due respect to new Minister van Schalkwyk, there is no disguising the fact that he was given the portfolio as the a "gift" for delivering NNP voters in the Western Cape to the ANC. He is an experienced politician and may well turn out to be a brilliant Minister, but that is not the point. The fact is that our President and his advisors saw the environmental portfolio as unimportant enough to be "traded away" for party political ends. It's hard to believe that of the 400-odd elected MPs to choose from, not one has the vision, skill and will to lead the environmental ministry.

The President has thrown Mr van Schalkwyk a bone. We can only wish him well and hope that he uses all the political leverage he can muster to build on the work of the outgoing minister. We can only hope that by the next election, our President has understood the message implicit in our Constitution, in the

Declaration of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, in the Millenium Development Goals, in the Desertification Convention, and in countless other agreements we are party to - that it is the poor who are most vulnerable to environmental degradation - that the link between environmental degradation, the extreme poverty of many and the excessive wealth of few is clear - and that the only real solutions to environmental problems are political ones.

Yours sincerely
etc.etc."

 

Google
WWW EMG's website